Research area
How should institutions govern AI-mediated behavior when it emerges from pathways spanning models, context, tools, workflows, people, and retained artifacts?
Position and method
The relevant unit of governance is the institutional pathway through which models, context, tools, workflows, people, and retained artifacts combine to shape consequential behavior.
The work keeps provenance, authority, review state, recoverability, and contestability visible across that pathway rather than locating responsibility inside one isolated model.
Current scope: one grounded area of inquiry supported by a BI-affiliated working paper and clearly separated external evidence.
This page is a bounded research orientation. It is not a programme, publication catalogue, canonical record, Archive, object service, or complete institutional history.
The paper treats the institutional cognition pathway—not the isolated model—as the consequential unit through which AI-mediated knowledge, judgment, and memory enter organizational life.
Current status: externally manifested as an SSRN working paper. Bounded Intelligence does not currently provide a separate publication record or object service.
Earlier related external work
Proceedings article · 2025
Related because it examines how AI-mediated knowledge generation destabilizes institutional validation.
External publisher record. This work is not presented as a Bounded Intelligence publication.
Author of the 2026 Bounded Intelligence-affiliated working paper.
Author of the 2026 Bounded Intelligence-affiliated working paper.